So, for example, a student loan incurred by one spouse before the marriage is the separate debt of the spouse who entered the union with the debt, which makes sense. After all, the education the loan purchased is an asset of the person who incurred the debt and got the education. Upon divorce, the parties cannot split the education as an asset, unlike a car loan incurred before marriage. Upon divorce, the car’s fair market value can be considered a marital asset, in whole or part, primarily when the parties used marital assets to make loan payments, and both used the vehicle.
The timing of the student debt is crucial. In determining whether or how much of the debt belongs to each spouse, a judge first determines the debt’s character as separate or marital. For example, a student loan incurred during the marriage, whether on behalf of one spouse or the children of the marriage, is a marital debt; both spouses are responsible for paying the debt. On the other hand, a student debt incurred before the marriage is separate property, and the debtor is liable to pay the loan.
Also, when one spouse cosigns for the other, a court would most likely apportion the debt between the parties, and the loan company would require payment from the cosigner when the primary signatory cannot pay. Unless the primary signer refinances the loan or otherwise removes the cosigner’s name from the loan, both are on the hook to pay the student loan. Since an equitable apportionment of debts applies only to marital debts, the designation of the property as marital or separate is critical. So, those debts brought into the marriage or incurred during the marriage are subject to a fair split.
What is fair will rest on the facts surrounding the debt and actions of the parties. For example, when one spouse brings the student debt into the marriage, and marital income pays for it, a court may apportion other assets and debts to make it fair to the party leaving the marriage with the lion’s share of debt due to a student loan. Additionally, a court may look at the benefit the marriage enjoyed through one party’s professional salary acquired by an educational degree and student loan. When the salary significantly increases marital assets, a court may consider it in apportioning the student loan debt between the parties. A court may split the student loan debt or configure another fair proportional split.
In addition, when one party acquires a professional degree during the marriage, and the other spouse supports the household to enable them to get their degree, the court may consider one party’s hardship during the marriage and assign the student loan to the degree-receiving spouse. Alternatively, a judge may award other assets to compensate the party who paid the bills and sacrificed their career while their spouse acquired an education. A court’s equity power can shift debts and assets in the marital debt and asset “pie” to do what’s fair.
Of course, when a writing allocates the student loan debt to one party, the court and the parties are bound by the terms of a pre or postnuptial agreement. A prenuptial agreement may designate who is responsible for the student loan debt, which is the law governing the divorce. Likewise, a postnuptial agreement governs the asset and debt split in a divorce. So, one spouse may come into the marriage with a student loan, but the spouses later agree in writing that both spouses pay the debt. In that instance, both parties must pay the debt in the divorce unless the postnuptial agreement states otherwise and does not violate any laws.
Written agreements help the parties control what happens in a divorce. However, divorcing couples can resolve their debt allocation by agreeing to terms in a marital settlement agreement. An experienced family law attorney will advise you that you have a better chance of working out your asset and debt allocation between you and your spouse satisfactorily than allowing the court to divide your property. The optimal situation is to pay off a student loan before marriage, but barring that option, you and your spouse can agree to a fair property division.
A family law attorney at Montanari Law Group can help you settle your divorce by informing you of the law that governs your divorce and what a family law judge would do in your circumstances. Our skilled divorce lawyers have crafted and negotiated numerous agreements and can lend our experience to your situation to help you knowledgeably agree to a marital settlement and avoid a trial.
As dedicated divorce attorneys helping clients throughout Passaic County, Bergen County, and Essex County, such as Hawthorne, Bloomingdale, Clifton, Fort Lee, Paramus, and Ridgefield Park, we can help you offset disproportionate debt to one party with marital assets when available. When assets are unavailable, we can advise you of the fairest and most logical way to handle post-divorce payments with an eye toward later refinancing or negotiating with the student loan lender. Contact us at (973) 233-4396 for a free consultation with a family law attorney about the best resolution when your divorce includes a student loan.
After much time and consideration, you decide to divorce. You know it is time to separate and divide everything you… Read More
If Both New Jersey Parents Consent to Waive Child Support, Can it be Done? Although some may view child support… Read More
The Increasing Prevalence of Remote Work and Far-Reaching Effects on Divorced Parents and NJ Custody Arrangements Getting out the door… Read More
Our Team of NJ Attorneys Provides Legal Guidance on Private School Tuition Payment Responsibilities and Disputes People divorce for many… Read More
Information is Power when it Comes to Manipulated and Deceptively Created Evidence in New Jersey Family Law Matters You and… Read More
What You Can and Cannot do when it Comes to Custody of an Unborn Child in New Jersey You find… Read More